PPT-Discourse Applications

Slides were adapted from Regina Barzilay Testing an hypothesis Pyramid use one document set from the training data that you had Can you use your late days Yes HW 2 If you think you were penalized for . John M. Swales. jmswales@umich.edu. The Colonic Title. . THEME .  DEVELOPMENT. . TOPIC  COMMENT. . THEORY  APPLICATION. . AIM  METHOD. . GENERAL  SPECIFIC. SENSE  NONSENSE. How consent is made. On communicative ethics. On . communicative ethics. In this model, ethics are in . practices,. not in . people.. We’d ask, are our interactions more or less reciprocal and is it possible to challenge existing theories and assumptions?. Julia Hirschberg. CS 4705. Thanks to Dan Jurafsky, Diane Litman, Andy Kehler, Jim Martin . What makes a text or dialogue coherent? . “Consider, for example, the difference between passages (18.71) and (18.72). Almost certainly not. The reason is that these utterances, when juxtaposed, will not exhibit coherence. Do you have a discourse? Assume that you have collected an arbitrary set of well-formed and independently interpretable utterances, for instance, by randomly selecting one sentence from each of the previous chapters of this book.” . Critical discourse analysis (CDA) attempts to disclose the ways societal structures and processes are se as a socio-semiotic process (M.A.K.Halliday), exponents of CDA assume that public discourse not “CDA [is]fundamentally interested in analyzing opaque as well as transparent structural relationships of dominance, discrimination, power, and control when these are manifested in language. In other words, CDA aims to investigate critically social inequality as it is expressed, constituted, and legitimized by language use.” (. Walter . Humes. University of Stirling. Four Challenges. Political. Philosophical. Pedagogical. Professional. Discourse Analysis. Where has the discourse come from?. Why has it come to prominence now?. Free . Write. Look out on the . UCWbL. physical space or think . about the . UCWbL’s. physical spaces. . . What comes to mind; what do you think of/about?. What . feelings do you have? . Describe . Wei . Guo. Overview. Background. Discourse Parser. Discourse Analysis. Existing Visualization Methods. DAViewer. Interface. Methodology. Use case scenarios. Background. discourse . parser:. a natural language processing system which can represent the organization of a document . Discourse analysis study the ways sentences and utterances. (speech). go together to make texts and interactions and how those texts and interactions fit into our social world.. It should be noticed also that discourse analysis is not just the study of language, but a way of looking at language as well.. John M. Swales. jmswales@umich.edu. Recently, John . Flowerdew. has argued that:. Genre. Task. Discourse community. form a powerful triad of concepts that undergird . EAPcurricula. .. Not much doubt about genre and task. The Next Generation. Rashmi. Prasad, Bonnie . W. ebber, . A. lan Lee. *. Aravind. Joshi. Outline. Introduction. Discourse Coherence and its annotation. PDTB Basics. PDTB enrichment. Motivation. New relations. Workshop on Discourse Functions of Demonstratives University of Oslo 14 - 15 June 2018 Åshild Næss Anna Margetts Yvonne Treis Jozina Vander Klok 1 Small programme change : dinner tomorrow Course Tutor: Prof. Dr. Ahmed Q. Abed. Content. . Introduction. 6.1 Grammar from Discourse Perspective. 6.2 The texture of a text. 6.3 Cohesion and Discourse. 6.4 Reference. 6.5 Lexical Cohesion . 6.6 Collocation. continuous stretch of language larger than . a sentence. , often constituting a coherent unit. , such . as sermon, argument, joke or narrative. .”. (. Crystal:1992). “stretches . of language perceived to be meaningful, .