PDF-2ORDERED GRANTING the motion for default judgment DE 308 as to Chon

147A judge of the court may accept reject or modify in whole or in part the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge148 28 USC 636b1 see also US v Raddatz 447. Complete section I of the Notice of Judgment and Order for Weekly Payments JDCV50 and file in duplicate with the Clerks Office FOR COURT USE ONLY RETURN DATE NAME OF PERSON SIGNING MOTION DOCKET NO ADDRESS OF COURT No street town and zip code SIGNED MOTION FOR ORDER DECLARING JUDGMENT SATISFIED Judgment in the amount of entered on was satisfied by DCCV051 Rev 0 2014 ORDER FOR SERVICE BY MAIL The Court being satisfied that despite reasonable efforts the Judgment Creditor cannot be served it is Federal Jurisdictions:. Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 55. . (a) . Entering a Default..  When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk . What is it Good For?. Presented by: Michael W. Pott and Carl L. Fessenden, Porter Scott. Moderator: Brian Kelley , Bickmore Risk Services. . What is the . purpose behind filing certain motions. . Rule 60.02 and . eviction judgments. Issues and topics . in this presentation. An introduction to Rule 60. Proper circumstances for a Rule 60.02 motion in an eviction action. Legal standards for relief from a judgment. reason to require the court to reserve decision on the motion. Under section (c), the error in overruling the motion cannot be cured by subsequent evidence Our mission is to help . improve: . Community . living and the quality of life for . our citizens . and . for visitors to the Kenora & LOW Region.. We work with donors to create permanent Endowment Funds for the benefit of charities in our Region. . James Kropid. Assistant Counsel, Illinois EPA. OBTAINING AN ORDER. THE ORDER IS THE . KEY. TO OBTAINING ANY RELIEF FROM THE DEFENDANT. . WITHOUT AN ORDER ALL YOU HAVE ARE UNENFORCEABLE ALLEGATIONS; THERE IS NOTHING TO COMPEL THE DEFENDANT. EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, BHISHO REPORTABLE Case N o. CA 31/13 In the matter between: THE MINISTER OF POLICE First Appellant BAYANDA MTSHULANE Second Appellant MASIBULELE MKHUZO Third Appellant a Client ID: Program: Housing and Essential Needs (HEN) Referral Incapacity Reviewtori fansoun omw review ren nipwakingawan om w HEN. Sia mochen ren tichikin om safei ren iei an epwe pwarata ukukun Case No. HC 790/09 X Ref HC 789/09; 1039/09; 1814/08; 1293/08 & 1496/06 1 JAMESON ZOWA Versus SUSAN ZOWA IN THE HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE KAMOCHA J BULAWAYO 11 JUNE 2010 L Nkomo for applicant L Mcijo fo 1DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUTRoyal Insurance Company of AmericaPlaintiffNo 301cv1317JBAvZygo Corporation DefendantRoyal Insurance Company of AmericaPlaintiffvNan Ya Technology CorporationThird-Party Defend N THE IRCUIT OURT OF THE TATE OF REGONFOR THE OUNTY OF Case NoPlaintiffLandlord or AgentvGENERAL JUDGMENTAND MONEY AWARDDefendantTenant or Occupantdate hearing was held in an action to recover possess Request for Order RFO can be filed at any time with or after PetitionTemporary OrdersEX PARTECan be filed any time with or after PetitionGranted or denied hearing Permanent OrdersCustody Montenegro5 M