PPT-Predicting the controversy of a Wikipedia article

Author : min-jolicoeur | Published Date : 2017-04-03

Taras Gritsenko Overview Introduction Background work Theoretical analysis Experimental designanalysis Conclusion Introduction Problem Is it possible to observe

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Predicting the controversy of a Wikipedi..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Predicting the controversy of a Wikipedia article: Transcript


Taras Gritsenko Overview Introduction Background work Theoretical analysis Experimental designanalysis Conclusion Introduction Problem Is it possible to observe controversy in Wikipedia articles using existing publicly available data. The controversy centres around the compatibility of the insulation with the hot bitumen that bonds the r oof membrane to it Other problems include dimensional instability cupping warping shrinking etc rigidity problems and off gassing Prior to the l . “opposite” “against” “contrary” “opposing”. contradict. . (v. ) to say or do something that is opposite or very different in meaning to something else that you said or did earlier . Lessons from the past illustrate the sad condition in our country and our churches.. Hosea 4:1-3. Listen . to . the word of the Lord, O sons of Israel,. For the Lord has a case . (controversy) against . Lesson 1 for October 6, 2012. THE PLAYERS OF THE CONTROVERSY. “. Just as surely as we have a personal . Saviour. , we have also a personal adversary, cruel and cunning, who ever watches our steps, and plots to lead us astray. He can work most effectually in disguise. Wherever the opinion is entertained that he does not exist, there he is most busy. When we least suspect his presence, he is gaining advantage over us. I feel alarmed as I see so many of the youth yielding to his power while they know it not. Did they but see their danger, they would flee to Christ, the sinner’s refuge. AP English. The Controversy. Types of Head-Scarves. France’s Ban. Turkey’s Ban. Perspective of People for Bans. Perspective of Muslim Women. Table of Contents. Pro-Headscarves. Muslim religion. Individual decision. N. ot?. Or . “How to Keep from Looking Like a Complete . Doofus. ”. What is Wikipedia?. . Wikipedia. . is a free . online encyclopedia. It is written.  collaboratively by the people who use it. . By Rob Hamilton. Anthony . DiLullo. James Kiernan. Who’s . Involved?. Where the screening started.. The current textbook authorization system began in 1947 under the direction of the U.S.-led Supreme Commander, Allied Powers (SCAP) authority during Japan's post-World War II occupation. . FIE 2009: Special Session. Holly Matusovich, Virginia Tech. Karl Smith, Purdue University/U of MN. Introduce Constructive Academic Controversy (CAC) ~ 15 min. Actively Participate in CAC ~60 min. Topic: . Lesson 9 for February 27, 2016. Many battles of the Great controversy took place during the birth of the Christian Church. The first Christians had to deal with personal conflicts and opposition.. WRONG IDEAS. By: Marti Goehringer. Controversial issues discussion. A controversial issues discussion is defined as reflective dialogue among students, or between students and teachers, about an issue on which there is disagreement. Typically a discussion is sparked by a question or assertion made either by a student or teacher. The ensuing dialogue then allows for the presentation of supportive evidence, comments, and the expression of differing points of view. Discussion is therefore, by nature, an interactive endeavor, and reflective dialogue engenders listening and responding to ideas expressed by one's peers.. The Art of Arguing to Enhance Learning. Lilly Teaching Seminar. Michigan State University. April 11, . 2013. Karl A. Smith. STEM Education Center / . Technological Leadership Institute. /. . Civil . Separating the nicotine from the smoke is an old idea. “Smokers smoke for the nicotine, but die from the tar”. Professor Mike Russell, Maudsley Smokers Clinic, 1979. The alternative nicotine product train is already heading down the tracks. Criterion-Related Validation. Regression & Correlation. What’s the difference between the two?. Significance . Testing. Type I and type II errors. Statistical power to reject the null. . Chapter 6 Predicting Future Performance. La gamme de thé MORPHEE vise toute générations recherchant le sommeil paisible tant désiré et non procuré par tout types de médicaments. Essentiellement composé de feuille de morphine, ce thé vous assurera d’un rétablissement digne d’un voyage sur .

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Predicting the controversy of a Wikipedia article"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents