PPT-1-1 Patterns and Inductive Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning When you use a pattern to find the next term in a sequence youre using inductive reasoning The conclusion youve made about the next terms in the pattern are called a . Arguments. Premise: . statement upon which an argument is based or from which a conclusion is drawn. Premise is either true or false. Arguments: . Consist of one or more premises and one conclusion or claim, which is drawn from those premises. . Summer 2009. 1. THE inductive Bible Study method. 2. How and Why to Read Books. The Bible is a special book. Divinely inspired, living and active. Studying literature vs. studying the Bible. English Scholars have many methods and can have many purposes for interpretation. Argument. Monty Python – Argument Clinic video. Monty Python. Premises + Conclusion = Argument. Argument – a group of statements including one or more premises and a conclusion. Premise – a statement in an argument that provides reason or support for the conclusion. Reasoning . Reasoning and Persuasion. Ethos, Pathos, Logos. Character, Emotion, and Logic. Mythos . Folk knowledge; interrelated set of beliefs, attitudes, values, and feelings held by members of a particular society/culture. Sub; legal method and legal reasoning. NITIN RANA. PARIKSHIT GAUR. PURNENDU . PuLKITPAL. . SINGH. RISHAB RAJ. RITIKA GAUTAM. Group MEMBERS ARE -. Deductive reasoning is sometimes referred to as top-down logic. Its counterpart, inductive reasoning, is sometimes referred to as bottom-up logic. Where deductive reasoning proceeds from general premises to a specific conclusion, inductive reasoning proceeds from specific premises to a general conclusion. . Ch. 2.1. Inductive Reasoning. - uses a number of specific examples to arrive at a conclusion.. used . in applications that involve prediction, forecasting, or . behavior . derived . using facts and instances which lead to the formation of a general . Lecture Outline. Inductive Reasoning. Generalizations. Cause and Effect. Analogy. Deductive Reasoning. Syllogism. Enthymeme. Inductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning: Review. The process of citing a number of specific examples or . Thinking Mathematically. Objectives. Understand mathematical reasoning . Distinguish between inductive and deductive reasoning . Identify . arithmetic and geometric sequences . Thinking Mathematically. Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.. You consider evidence you have seen or heard to draw a conclusion about things you . haven’t . seen or heard. The intellectual movement from limited facts (. Induction vs. deduction. Inductive. arguments aim to make the conclusion . probable. , not . certain. , . though . sometimes, . extremely. probable.. False conclusion is logically compatible with true . Mimi . Opkins. CECS 100. Fall 2011. Problem Solving. Logic. – The science of correct reasoning.. Reasoning. – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from known or assumed facts.. When solving a problem, one must understand the question, gather all pertinent facts, analyze the problem i.e. compare with previous problems (note similarities and differences), perhaps use pictures or formulas to solve the problem.. CT 101. Dr. Bowman. Deductive argument. A . deductive argument.  is an argument that is intended by the arguer to be deductively valid, that is, to provide a guarantee of the truth of the conclusion provided that the argument's premises are true. . - Charles Sanders Peirce. On the Radar. Researching the Persuasive Speech Assignment. Due Wednesday on . WebCT. (by 11:59 p.m.). Exam Two. This Friday in Lecture. Study Guide on Course Website. Workshops for the Persuasive Speech. 1. John D. Norton. Department of History and Philosophy of Science. University of Pittsburgh. June 29, 2022. Mangoletsi. -Potts Lectures 2022. Material Theory of Induction. 2. 3. This Talk. 4. There is no.