PPT-Why do non-Mendelian

Author : calandra-battersby | Published Date : 2017-04-05

patterns occur When to decide whether it is Mendelian or nonMendelian Determine the most probable genetic crosses based on the following data Two lines of truebreeding

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Why do non-Mendelian" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Why do non-Mendelian: Transcript


patterns occur When to decide whether it is Mendelian or nonMendelian Determine the most probable genetic crosses based on the following data Two lines of truebreeding plants one with yellow petals and one with red are crossed The F1 are all red When the F1 . 5 CC 35 100 100 CC brPage 4br brPage 5br brPage 6br 8486 brPage 7br brPage 8br SUPPLY CURRENT mA 08 06 04 02 10 20 040 SUPPLY VOLTAGE V amb 7057520C amb 12557520C amb 057520C amb 2557520C amb 5557520C INPUT CURRENT nA 20 10 20 040 SUPPLY VOLTAGE V Genetics. Law of Independent Assortment. What is inheritance?. Passing of genetic information from one generation to the next. Law of. Independent. . Assortment . not connected with another or with each other; separate.. Heterotic Non Geometries&F theory (vaguest title in this workshop) Heterotic Non - & F - Department of Applied Mathematics & Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of Cambridge J.M., D. R. Morrison & S. Sethi Mendelian. Genomics. www.mendelian.org. gmendel@mendelian.org. Goal: Identify and define the causes of all human . monogenic diseases. Explain human biology. Allow diagnostic testing important for disease prevention, therapy and prognosis. Genetics Part II. Co-Dominance, Incomplete Dominance, and . Epistasis. Review. Last week we discussed Basic . Mendelian. Genetics – . Some genes are dominant and are always expressed. Some genes are recessive and only expressed if no dominant genes are present. Inheritance . and The complex genetics of common . disorders. . Human Genetics. Genetics 202. Jon Bernstein. Department of Pediatrics. October 8, 2015. Session Goals – Non-Mendelian Inheritance. Understand how imprinting occurs and gain familiarity with conditions in which imprinting plays a role.. Non - - Secure Item***Non - Secure Item***Non - Secure Item ISTEP+ Applied Skills Sample for Classroom Use ELA – Grade 6 (Constructed - Response, Extended - Response) 1 Excerpt from The Win (Fundamentals of Genetics). Chapter 9. Heredity. The transmission of characteristics from parent to offspring. . Trait (allele)- variant of a characteristic. Mendel observed 7 characteristics of pea plants.. 2015-2016. Ms. McCabe. standards. SC.912.L.16.1 Use Mendel’s laws of segregation and independent assortment to . analyze. patterns of . inheritance.. SC.912.L.16.2 . . Discuss. observed inheritance patterns caused by various modes of inheritance, including dominant, recessive, codominant, sex-linked, polygenic, and multiple alleles.. What it is & What it can do for you. Knowledge Management & Eskind Biomedical Library. January 27, 2012. helen . n. aylor. helen.naylor@vanderbilt.edu. 936.3103. Objectives. Quick review of Central Dogma. Exome. sequencing identifies the cause of a . Mendelian. disorder.. Nat. Genet. 42, 30–35 (2010).. Cupped ears. coloboma. of the lower eyelids, . prominent . nose, . micrognathia. . absence . of the fifth digits of the feet. Status is ubiquitous in modern life, yet our understanding of its role as a driver of inequality is limited.  In Status, sociologist and social psychologist Cecilia Ridgeway examines how this ancient and universal form of inequality influences today’s ostensibly meritocratic institutions and why it matters. Ridgeway illuminates the complex ways in which status affects human interactions as we work together towards common goals, such as in classroom discussions, family decisions, or workplace deliberations. Ridgeway’s research on status has important implications for our understanding of social inequality. Distinct from power or wealth, status is prized because it provides affirmation from others and affords access to valuable resources. Ridgeway demonstrates how the conferral of status inevitably contributes to differing life outcomes for individuals, with impacts on pay, wealth creation, and health and wellbeing. Status beliefs are widely held views about who is better in society than others in terms of esteem, wealth, or competence. These beliefs confer advantages which can exacerbate social inequality. Ridgeway notes that status advantages based on race, gender, and class—such as the belief that white men are more competent than others—are the most likely to increase inequality by facilitating greater social and economic opportunities. Ridgeway argues that status beliefs greatly enhance higher status groups’ ability to maintain their advantages in resources and access to positions of power and make lower status groups less likely to challenge the status quo. Many lower status people will accept their lower status when given a baseline level of dignity and respect—being seen, for example, as poor but hardworking. She also shows that people remain willfully blind to status beliefs and their effects because recognizing them can lead to emotional discomfort. Acknowledging the insidious role of status in our lives would require many higher-status individuals to accept that they may not have succeeded based on their own merit many lower-status individuals would have to acknowledge that they may have been discriminated against. Ridgeway suggests that inequality need not be an inevitable consequence of our status beliefs. She shows how status beliefs can be subverted—as when we reject the idea that all racial and gender traits are fixed at birth, thus refuting the idea that women and people of color are less competent than their male and white counterparts. This important new book demonstrates the pervasive influence of  status on social inequality and suggests ways to ensure that it has a less detrimental impact on our lives. multifactorial traits affected research into Mendelian disorders? Stylianos E. Antonarakis. For about a century, the argument for focusing on rare Mendelian disorders was as follows: Mendelian ph Exceptions. Mendel got lucky – all 7 traits he studied showed . complete . (simple). dominance. .. Mendelian. Exceptions. Mendel got lucky – all 7 traits he studied showed . complete . (simple).

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Why do non-Mendelian"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents